Trial evidence this week revealed that Donald Trump’s Mar-a-Lago residence had a market value of $27 million in 2020, much less than the $612 million that he claimed in financial documents.
The news came to light during the fifth week of New York Attorney General Letitia James’ $250 million civil fraud case against the former president and his family, in which she has accused them of fraudulently inflating their net worth over the years to gain better loan and insurance rates.
From 2011 through 2021, Trump had valued his Florida property between $426 million and $612 million on annual statements of financial condition. A judge ruled last month that this was “at least 2,300% more” than the local official’s valuation.
Trump is scheduled to testify on November 6. His daughter, Ivanka Trump, was set to take the stand on Friday, though her testimony was postponed until November 8 due to her appeal of the judge’s ruling.
The former president, who is running for re-election in 2024, has repeatedly denied the claims against him and asserted that he is the target of a political witch hunt.
In addition to a raft of legal cases against him, Trump was recently removed from the Forbes 400 list of richest Americans, leading him to lash out at the publication.
Smollett’s lead attorney Nenye Uche said the case should have never gone to trial in…
A 2023 study found that black women received just barely 0.03% of radio station airplay,…
The Ukrainian Armed Forces said it targeted a Russian military command post on the grounds of a…
In the days after Donald Trump's victory, MSNBC's ratings dropped by 54%, and since the…
https://youtu.be/hc4915dr-fk Firefighters in northern Honduras used a zip line to help a dog and its…
As Spelling's financial statements continue to contradict each other, it is impossible to determine where…
View Comments
Why doesn’t this article address why there is such of discrepancy in valuation? There is a deed restriction on the MAL property that will not allow development. Trump’s number ignores that restriction while the assessor reflects the restriction.